Bulk updating multiple columns in oracle Totally free mobile fuck date

Something that has been said many times, but needs constant repeating until every developer is aware of its importance, is the performance difference between row-by-row updating and bulk updating. Let me ask this differently: The best way to find out is to benchmark.If you cannot guess which one will be much faster, remember that row-by-row kinda rhymes with "slow-by-slow" (hint, hint). I'm doing two benchmarks for this: Run 1, Statement 1 : .01457 (avg : .0098) Run 1, Statement 2 : .0133 (avg : .01291) Run 1, Statement 3 : .02351 (avg : .02519) Run 2, Statement 1 : .00882 (avg : .0098) Run 2, Statement 2 : .01159 (avg : .01291) Run 2, Statement 3 : .02348 (avg : .02519) Run 3, Statement 1 : .01012 (avg : .0098) Run 3, Statement 2 : .01453 (avg : .01291) Run 3, Statement 3 : .02544 (avg : .02519) Run 4, Statement 1 : .00799 (avg : .0098) Run 4, Statement 2 : .01346 (avg : .01291) Run 4, Statement 3 : .02958 (avg : .02519) Run 5, Statement 1 : .00749 (avg : .0098) Run 5, Statement 2 : .01166 (avg : .01291) Run 5, Statement 3 : .02396 (avg : .02519) The difference between Statement 1 and 3 is a factor of 2.5x.Examples Update every row in the table SALES: UPDATE Sales SET Supplier_ID=123; Update multiple rows in the table SALES: UPDATE Sales SET Supplier_ID=123 WHERE Supplier_ID=25; Update two columns in the table JOURNALS, use to present the two numbers that will be inserted as a subquery, note that two sides of the SET statement must have the same number of columns: UPDATE journals SET (jo_money,jo_account_ref) = (select 64.5, 1467 from dual) WHERE jo_journal_pk ='RS512'; Update two columns in the table JOURNALS, insert a numeric and a date value: UPDATE journals SET (jo_money,jo_date) = (select 64.5, to_date('2011-Dec-30', 'YYYY'-Mon-DD) from dual) WHERE jo_journal_pk ='RS512'; Update multiple rows in a subquery (joining two tables): “Even God cannot change the past” ~ Agathon Related Oracle Commands: DELETE - Delete rows EXPLAIN PLAN INSERT - Insert rows MERGE - Select rows for update or insert into a table.SELECT TRUNCATE - Empty table ALTER TRIGGER - Disable a trigger to perform bulk updates without the trigger firing.Let's say we have a simple table for our blog posts (using Oracle syntax, but the effect is the same on all databases): CREATE TABLE post ( id INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, text VARCHAR2(1000) NOT NULL, archived NUMBER(1) NOT NULL CHECK (archived IN (0, 1)), creation_date DATE NOT NULL ); CREATE INDEX post_creation_date_i ON post (creation_date); statement is probably better than looping over each individual row and updating each individual row explicitly. Showing the time it takes for each statement type to complete, each time updating 3649 / 10000 rows.The winner is: Statement 1, running a bulk update It looks like this: We'd get far worse results for larger tables!

A more effective solution to this problem is to attempt to reduce the number of UPDATE statements.

You need an exclusive lock on affected rows either way. If you are dealing with a huge number of rows and you don't need a consistent state (all rows or none), you can split the operation into multiple batches. ) Increases the total cost, but keeps the lock time per row shorter.

UPDATE [hint] [schema.]table [@dblink] [alias] SET col_expr(s) [WHERE condition] [ RETURNING (expr,…) INTO (data_item,…) ] UPDATE [hint] [schema.]table [[SUB]PARTITION (partition)] [alias] SET col_expr(s) [WHERE condition] [ RETURNING (expr,…) INTO (data_item,…) ] UPDATE [hint] [schema.]view [@dblink] [alias] SET col_expr(s) [WHERE condition] [ RETURNING (expr,…) INTO (data_item,…) ] UPDATE [hint] [schema.]materialized_view [@dblink] [alias] SET col_expr(s) [WHERE condition] [ RETURNING (expr,…) INTO (data_item,…) ] UPDATE [hint] (subquery) WITH SET col_expr(s) [WHERE condition] [ RETURNING (expr,…) INTO (data_item,…) ] UPDATE [hint] TABLE (table_collection_expression) [( )] SET col_expr(s) [WHERE condition] [ RETURNING (expr,…) INTO (data_item,…) ] col_expr: column = expression column = (subquery) column = DEFAULT (column, column,…) = (subquery) VALUE (table_alias) = expression VALUE (table_alias) = (subquery) To update multiple columns, separate col_expr with commas.

In this case there are two distinct values, so we can do it in two UPDATE statements: So we can reduce the number of queries from five to two. But the extent to which this helps us reduces as the proportion of distinct SET values goes up.

Eventually every SET value is different, for example: UPDATE staff SET salary = 1125 WHERE name = ' Bob'; UPDATE staff SET salary = 1200 WHERE name = ' Jane'; UPDATE staff SET salary = 1100 WHERE name = ' Frank'; UPDATE staff SET salary = 1175 WHERE name = ' Susan'; UPDATE staff SET salary = 1150 WHERE name = ' John'; Since every SET clause is now different, we can’t coalesce any queries using the approaches mentioned before, so we still have one UPDATE statement for every row requiring changes. What if we had a database table which contained a representation of the updates we wanted to make, e.g.

Leave a Reply